The Unlikely Birth of Hormone Medicine
A aging scientist injects himself with a bizarre extract from animal testicles, and the modern science of hormones is born.
In 1889, the renowned French physiologist Charles-Édouard Brown-Séquard made a startling announcement to the scientific community. At 72 years old, he claimed to have restored his vitality, mental clarity, and physical strength by injecting himself with an extract prepared from the testicles of dogs and guinea pigs. This dramatic self-experiment ignited both fascination and controversy, launching a medical practice known as organotherapy and setting in motion a scientific revolution that would ultimately give birth to the modern field of reproductive endocrinology. What began as questionable rejuvenation therapy would evolve into rigorous hormone science that has transformed our understanding of fertility, sexuality, and human development.
French physiologist whose self-experimentation with testicular extracts launched the field of organotherapy.
The therapeutic use of animal gland and organ extracts to treat diseases in humans.
Long before Brown-Séquard's experiment, the fundamental idea that animal parts could treat human ailments had existed for centuries. Ancient medical canons suggested that "the brain helps the brain, and lungs the lungs" - embodying the principle that like treats like 1 . However, Brown-Séquard brought this concept into the scientific era by proposing that specific organs produced internal secretions that could be extracted and used therapeutically.
Organotherapy rapidly evolved from folk remedy to commercial enterprise. By the early 20th century, physicians like Henry R. Harrower had built lucrative practices and businesses producing and marketing glandular extracts on an industrial scale 2 . Harrower and his contemporaries advocated "pleuriglandular" therapy - treatments using extracts from multiple glands - for conditions ranging from reproductive failure to epilepsy and "mental deterioration" 2 .
The commercial success of organotherapy was staggering, but the medical establishment remained deeply skeptical. Without standardized extracts or rigorous clinical trials, these treatments occupied a questionable space between emerging science and profitable quackery.
Historical medical illustration showing glandular anatomy
Though historical records lack the precise detail of modern scientific papers, we can reconstruct Brown-Séquard's famous experiment from contemporary accounts:
Brown-Séquard obtained testicles from young dogs and guinea pigs shortly after their death 3 .
He mashed the glandular tissue and created an aqueous (water-based) extract. Notably, his method used water rather than lipid solvents 3 .
He filtered the preparation and injected it into his own body using a hypodermic syringe 3 .
He meticulously recorded subjective changes in his physical strength, mental alertness, and bodily functions before and after the injections.
Brown-Séquard reported remarkable improvements following his self-administered treatment:
He claimed increased muscle strength and endurance, allowing him to work longer hours without fatigue 3 .
He described heightened mental clarity and improved cognitive function 3 .
He reported restoration of bodily functions that had declined with age 3 .
| Category of Effect | Specific Changes Reported | Duration of Effects |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Capacity | Increased strength, endurance | Temporary |
| Mental Function | Improved concentration, clarity | Several hours post-injection |
| Bodily Functions | Restoration of age-declined functions | Required repeated injections |
The medical establishment overwhelmingly dismissed Brown-Séquard's claims. Critics rightly noted that testosterone and other sex steroids are lipid-soluble molecules that wouldn't dissolve effectively in his aqueous extract 3 . The concentration of active hormone in his preparation was likely negligible, making the reported effects impossible to attribute to testosterone.
Modern analysis suggests Brown-Séquard experienced a powerful placebo effect - his belief in the treatment produced real subjective improvements. Furthermore, his method of mashing entire tissue would have released various proteins, peptides, and other molecules that might have had non-specific biological effects 1 .
Despite its scientific shortcomings, Brown-Séquard's experiment had profound consequences:
It stimulated serious scientific interest in the concept of internal secretions, eventually leading to the discovery of hormones.
It commercialized organotherapy, making glandular extracts widely available and funding further research.
It established a paradigm that organ extracts could treat diseases of those same organs in patients.
By the 1920s, prominent endocrinologists like Harvey Cushing were publicly condemning organotherapy as "pseudoscientific reports" that discredited legitimate endocrine research 2 . Yet, the practice had already laid the groundwork for transformative discoveries.
| Period | Dominant Approach | Key Developments | Major Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1889-1920 | Crude Organotherapy | Brown-Séquard's experiment; commercial glandular extracts | Variable potency; no standardization; poorly understood mechanisms |
| 1920s-1930s | Hormone Isolation | Insulin (1922); estrogen (1929); testosterone (1935) | Difficulty isolating and synthesizing hormones |
| 1940s-Present | Modern Endocrinology | Synthetic hormones; understanding of feedback mechanisms; receptor biology | Balancing efficacy with side effects; individual variation in response |
The transition from questionable organotherapy to rigorous endocrinology required developing specialized research materials and methods. While Brown-Séquard worked with crude mashed tissue, scientists soon developed more sophisticated approaches to isolate and study hormones.
Mashed animal tissues in water - early attempts to extract active principles from endocrine glands.
Glandular tissues processed with organic solvents - effectively extracted steroid hormones like testosterone and estrogen.
Live animals with measured physiological responses - quantified hormone potency by effects on growth or tissue changes.
Chemically manufactured steroid hormones - provided standardized materials for research and therapy.
The legacy of organotherapy extends far beyond historical curiosity. Today's scientists are creating miniature organoids - three-dimensional, self-organizing structures grown from stem cells that recapitulate the complexity of actual organs 4 . Researchers have successfully generated organoids modeling the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and trophoblasts (placental cells) 4 .
These modern "organ extracts" allow scientists to study reproductive biology and disease with unprecedented precision. Unlike Brown-Séquard's crude preparations, organoids provide genetically stable, reproducible models that maintain commitment to their tissue of origin during long-term culture 4 . They're being used to study conditions ranging from endometriosis to ovarian cancer, and even to test potential treatments.
Modern laboratory research using organoids to study reproductive biology
The parallel is striking: both approaches recognize that the best way to understand an organ may be to work with that organ itself. But where organotherapy relied on animal glands, modern science uses human-derived cells in carefully controlled laboratory conditions. The principle of "like studying like" remains, but the execution has transformed beyond recognition.
Furthermore, contemporary research has rediscovered that organ-specific tissues contain bioactive nano-peptides that can influence cellular function. In 2018, researchers demonstrated that nano-peptides from testicular tissue could increase sperm motility by 50-70%, while ovarian-derived peptides improved follicle viability and maturation 1 . These findings suggest that Brown-Séquard's fundamental intuition - that tissues contain specific regulatory molecules - was correct, even if his methodology was flawed.
The journey from organotherapy to reproductive endocrinology represents more than just scientific progress - it illustrates how medical science evolves from observation to mechanism, from tradition to evidence. What began with a maverick scientist injecting himself with questionable extracts matured into a rigorous science that has transformed reproductive medicine.
This historical episode contains cautionary tales about the need for scientific rigor and the dangers of commercializing unproven treatments. Yet it also reminds us that seemingly bizarre ideas can sometimes contain kernels of truth worth investigating properly. The modern understanding of hormonal regulation of the menstrual cycle, fertility treatments, and contraceptive technologies all stand on the foundation built by these early pioneers - both the rigorous scientists and the questionable charlatans.
As contemporary researchers continue to unravel the complexities of reproductive biology using increasingly sophisticated tools like organoids and nano-peptides, they walk a path first blazed by Brown-Séquard and his contemporaries - the enduring quest to understand and responsibly harness the body's chemical messengers.